Close Menu
Techs Slash

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    An insight into Juvenile law in the UAE

    July 18, 2025

    High Temperature Thermocouple: Key Features You Should Know

    July 17, 2025

    Chrome Hearts: Redefining Streetwear With Luxury Edge

    July 17, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Techs Slash
    • Home
    • News
      • Tech
      • Crypto News
      • Cryptocurrency
    • Entertainment
      • Actors
      • ANGEL NUMBER
      • Baby Names
      • Beauty
      • beauty-fashion
      • facebook Bio
      • Fitness
      • Dubai Tour
    • Business
      • Business Names
    • Review
      • Software
      • Smartphones & Apps
    • CONTRIBUTION
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Techs Slash
    Home»Environment»Recycling is an outdated solution — it’s time for a circular economy
    Environment

    Recycling is an outdated solution — it’s time for a circular economy

    Ranveer KumarBy Ranveer KumarApril 8, 2021No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/cadesimu/techsslash.com/wp-content/themes/smart-mag/partials/single/featured.php on line 78
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Plastic in America will continue invading our landfills, floating in our oceans, and contaminating our bodies as long as we are stuck in the 20th-century linear economic mindset of “take-make-waste.”  What the 21st-century needs is an intersectional approach to the plastics crisis.

    In March, the Break Free from Plastic Act of 2021 (BFFPA) was reintroduced to Congress, targeting the chemicals and plastics industries for their role in pollution and landfilling. The bill argues for increasing recycling rates, shifting financial responsibility for recycling and waste management systems to upstream producers, and bans an expanded list of petroleum-based, single-use plastic products.

    This is a good starting point, but these are linear solutions that still result in wasted resources and only incremental improvements to the economic models that are fueling the climate crisis. If we are to successfully address climate change, the BFFPA must push for circular economy principles that design out the concepts of waste and pollution entirely and advance regenerative natural systems instead.

    The BFFPA proposes to improve recycling rates and impose waste management fees to reduce plastic pollution. These solutions have a number of inherent issues. Currently, a mere 9 percent of plastics are recycled each year. Improving this rate, even doubling or tripling it, won’t tackle an issue of the size we’re facing: over 35 million tons of plastic are produced each year in the U.S., and over 31 million tons are landfilled.

    The bill also suggests we bolster American recycling by shifting the cost of recycling and downstream waste management programs from taxpayers to polluters via packaging fees. (The American Chemistry Council (ACC) suggested pooling private and taxpayer funding instead.) However, if 91 percent of plastics are landfilled, changing the funding stream isn’t automatically going to ensure plastics actually end up in the recycling system.

    Let’s be clear: plastic is toxic, and the chemicals that are used to produce petroleum-based plastics are toxic, too. Plastics break down into microplastics; washing fabrics or products with plastic sheds these microplastics into our landfills and oceans — we can’t recapture that in recycling systems.

    Recycling means recirculating inherently toxic materials, giving them another chance to infect our food webs and bodies with potentially poisonous results. Just as critics question carbon sequestration technology as a solution for emissions — when what we need to do is stop emitters from emitting — we must question the chemicals and plastics industries’ focus on recycling.

    Enforcing the belief that recycling is the only solution will drive plastics production and waste generation (thus increasing greenhouse gas emissions.) Plastic production from petroleum-based virgin resin production is a major contributor of C02, and improving downstream recycling doesn’t clean up carbon-intense upstream production.

    In addition to upstream emissions, recycling ignores local air and water pollution, directly impacting low-income communities of color, in whose backyards these toxic industries exist.

    The BFFPA needs to go beyond recycling and build the legislative framework for a true circular economy, enabling development of emerging waste-to-biomaterials technology to tackle the conjoined climate crises of plastic and food waste generation.

    Beyond a packaging fee, these industries need a real incentive to move away from carbon-intensive chemicals and packaging production to safe materials production. Subsidies for these industries need to be cut, taxes on emissions and local pollution instituted, and incentive programs passed to modern, clean industries instead.

    An opportunity to build a circular economy exists within the BFFPA. In 2018, the U.S. generated 35.7 million tons of plastic, 12.2 percent of total municipal solid waste generation. That same year, 35.3 million tons of American food waste was landfilled, contributing to methane and carbon emissions.

    Technology exists that creates compostable biomaterials from food waste; we should be incentivizing these solutions to displace oil-based plastics in our supply chain and reduce organic waste landfilling. The BFFPA’s proposed ban on certain single-use plastic (SUP) products would be better framed as enforcement that SUP products be made of certified degradable biomaterials. In this arena, Polyhydroxalkanoate (PHA), is emerging as both an upstream and downstream solution.

    PHA is a compostable, non-toxic biomaterial with higher degradation rates than traditional bioplastics and has broad product development potential, making it a unique and valuable material in the global materials palette. The global PHA market size is estimated to nearly double from 2020 to 2025 to $98.5 million with a CAGR of 11.5 percent, as consumers and corporations demand sustainable plastic alternatives.

    A number of emerging biomaterials companies are working towards this shared goal of displacing plastics and reducing pollution. Danimer Scientific, prior to investigation for possible securities laws violations as of March 25, seemed poised to lead the PHA market to commercial scale, noting their PHA was sold out through 2022 and expected to sell out again through 2024 once its greenfield facility was fully operational.

    Of the North American PHA producers though, only Full Cycle Bioplastics has a patented technology that produces PHA from existing organic waste streams, as compared to Danimer’s canola- and soy-derived PHA, or NewLight Technologies’ and Mango Materials’ methane-derived PHA.

    By sourcing waste that would otherwise be landfilled, Full Cycle’s waste-to-PHA reduces methane and carbon emissions via landfill avoidance on the front-end, and displaces oil-based plastics on the back-end.

    The BFFPA is an opportunity to re-localize production and waste management, circularize the economy, and reimagine technological progress and economic solutions. As the BFFPA enters national debate, legislators and advocates should be clear to adjust definitions of “single use” to avoid bans on compostable or marine safe PHA-based materials while incentivizing the development of PHA production facilities.

    As the U.S. develops a green recovery plan, these nuances will be critical for the emerging domestic biomaterials industry. Companies in the PHA materials space are developing circular economies of scale that address landfilling, waste generation, and greenhouse gas emissions.

    By eradicating petroleum-based plastic from our supply chains, our communities, and the environment, the BFFPA can set the U.S. on the right path to a healthier, more sustainable economic recovery.

    Delaine Mayer is a member of the New York University SPS Energy, Climate Justice and Sustainability Lab Advisory Board.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Ranveer Kumar
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Why Cardboard Baler Rental is the Smart Choice for Your Business

    July 16, 2024

    The Relationship Between Commercial Lighting And Employee Productivity

    March 5, 2024

    Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries

    March 5, 2024
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Sapne Me Nahane Ka Matlab

    March 18, 2024

    Sapne Me Nagn Stri Dekhna

    March 18, 2024

    Self Reliance: Release Date, Cast, Plot, Trailer, and More Information

    March 18, 2024

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    ABOUT TECHSSLASH

    Welcome to Techsslash! We're dedicated to providing you with the best of technology, finance, gaming, entertainment, lifestyle, health, and fitness news, all delivered with dependability.

    Our passion for tech and daily news drives us to create a booming online website where you can stay informed and entertained.

    Enjoy our content as much as we enjoy offering it to you

    Most Popular

    Sapne Me Nahane Ka Matlab

    March 18, 2024

    Sapne Me Nagn Stri Dekhna

    March 18, 2024

    Self Reliance: Release Date, Cast, Plot, Trailer, and More Information

    March 18, 2024
    CONTACT DETAILS

    Phone: +92-302-743-9438
    Email: contact@serpinsight.com

    Our Recommendation

    Here are some helpfull links for our user. hopefully you liked it.

    Techs Slash
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • About us
    • contact us
    • Affiliate Disclosure
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Write for us
    • Daman Game
    © 2025 Techsslash. All Rights Reserved

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.