Grab attention at all costs; seems to be the mantra for some brands these days. But is that shock value truly worth the risk?
Negative marketing campaigns promise high rewards – buzz, viral attention, and tapping into consumer frustrations. However, they also come with considerable reputational dangers that can sometimes alienate your audience.
The lure of attention can be irresistible for marketers and brands. But trampling over people’s values in the process is playing with ethical fire.
Does negative marketing actually lift sales or just erode public sentiment? And whether it is good or bad?
Many brands use negative marketing tactics and manage to come out unscathed – some even see lifts in sales and brand image. The answer lies in how strategically it is done.
Controversial messaging is a high-risk, high-reward gambit. Pull it off and the brand looks brave. Mess it up and you look exploitative.
The key is authentic positioning and knowing your audience. Nike took some heat but also saw sales jump after its Kaepernick ad.
The ad fit with Nike’s values around athletic perseverance and tapped into an issue their core demographic cares about.
Dove proactively addressed distorted beauty standards, fitting their campaign for real beauty. Burger King’s anti-bullying ad felt true to their brand persona.
The sweet spot is when controversy aligns with the brand’s ethos versus just chasing shock value. It’s a fine line between edgy and opportunistic.
Brands already resonant with younger demographics can pull this balance off more easily.
Leveraging cultural tensions feels more authentic coming from brands who have already built brand equity with those who appreciate activism.
Negative marketing also works best when consumer frustration already exists and the brand lends its voice for catharsis.
Tapping into anger around social inequality, fear of climate change impacts, or outrage against political figures can work if audiences believe the brand cares too.
Done right, negative marketing leverages tension while also further building a brand’s character. Done exploitatively and it can undermine years of customer trust.
But with so much activism blurring the lines between business and society, brands willing to take stands while avoiding pitfalls can come out ahead with sales and sentiment.
Would you like to analyze gaps crushing your web presence? Call +44 7388 594549 and request to speak with an ambitious SEO expert in Coventry now. One who won’t blink until you ABSOLUTELY DOMINATE search visibility!
What is negative marketing?
Negative marketing refers to advertising or messaging that deliberately uses negative emotions like fear, anger, or sadness to drive consumer reactions and conversations around a brand. The goal is to spark visceral reactions that compel consumers to share, engage with, and talk about the divisive messaging.
Common negative tactics include:
– Fear Appeal Marketing: Warning of dire consequences if consumers don’t use or engage with a product or service. This preys on anxieties.
– Outrage Marketing: Deliberately angering or offending the audience through controversial stances or messaging. The goal is virality via outrage sharing even if dislike oriented.
– Attack Ads: Directly insulting or disparaging competitors instead of touting your own brand merits. Attempts to tap into consumer frustrations.
– Exclusion Marketing: Spreading messages that stereotype, generalize, or alienate specific demographics to appeal favorably to the intended part of the audience.
– Shock Value: Incorporating taboo, offensive imagery, or comparisons for attention. Trading uproar for awareness.
The psychology is negativity and controversy breeds faster sharing and reactions compared to positive messaging. Strong emotions compel people to react and share which gives brands visibility.
However, this viral attention doesn’t always increase affinity or purchase intent long-term. While negative marketing can attack competitors, it can also taint your own brand reputation and turn off consumers who disagree with tactics.
Attention isn’t the same as loyalty, this is why many digital advertising companies are very cautious with negative marketing despite the visibility rewards.
Benefits of being negative in marketing
Negative marketing certainly carries some risks, but there are tactical gains fueled by consumer psychology worth examining. When done strategically, outrage sparks rapid awareness and attention.
The approach harnesses two advantages – the power of emotions like anger to compel sharing across social channels. As well as protagonist psychology, where brands can position themselves as the counterpoint hero against a villain.
Why do responsible brands follow the old adage – “there is no such thing as bad publicity”?
1. Attention-grabbing: Negative emotions like anger, fear, and shock value are powerful at capturing consumer attention rapidly. This cuts through the clutter of all the marketing messages people are exposed to daily.
2. Social media sharing: Outrage, controversy, and anger are top triggers for virality. Negative campaigns tap into emotions that fuel conversations and sharing across social networks.
3. Brand awareness: For lesser-known brands, angering or shocking audiences can bring awareness rapidly due to coverage of the controversy and backlash itself. Short-term visibility.
4. Positioning as a protagonist: Taking a strong or extreme stance on an issue positions a brand as the “hero” to consumers who share that view. Allows resonance with specific demographics.
5. Youth engagement: Younger demographics are often less likely to be offended by irreverent messaging and more likely to appreciate shock value or controversy tactics.
6. Encourages media coverage: Negative campaigns garner coverage as journalists report on backlashes, controversies, and advertiser mistakes. Earned media visibility.
7. Reinforcing loyalty: Existing brand fans may passionately share or defend negative messaging that resonates with their beliefs on an issue or against competitors.
The key is balancing short-term attention rewards with long-term risks to brand reputation and corporate character. But handled correctly, negative marketing can cut through noise.
What are the drawbacks of negative marketing
The shock value that fuels initial awareness can have lasting impacts on consumer trust and affinity. Ultimately, a brand’s character matters more than any temporary viral attention.
The hazards of swimming in societal fault lines include alienating demographics, campaign backlashes, and permanent association with negativity. Not all press is good press when it undermines public sentiment and loyal relationships built over the years.
1. Reputational damage: Controversial messaging can undermine years of building positive brand equity and trust. Long-term affinity is sacrificed for temporary buzz.
2. Alienates audiences: Rather than bringing new loyalists into the fold, negative tactics can isolate demographics that disagree with messaging or find it offensive.
3. Invites backlashes: In today’s activist days, brands see crises when campaigns go too far. Social channels accelerate coordinated backlashes.
4. Distorts brand ethos: Explicitly negative associations can taint a brand’s character if shock value doesn’t fit company values. Makes brands inauthentic.
5. Limits mass appeal: While resonating with some fringe groups, controversial messaging rarely appeals to mass general public over time.
6. Triggering emotions doesn’t mean purchase: Just because someone engages or shares negative content doesn’t mean they’ll buy from the related brand afterward.
7. Hard to control reactions: Once controversial messaging goes viral, it takes on a life of its own. Brands struggle to manage rapid responses.
8. Backfire Potential: Negative campaigns always run the risk of spurring greater public outcries against the brand, beyond the initial outrage. If consumers deem the marketing offensive or exploitative, vocal online backlashes can damage the brand exponentially more.
9. Legal Entanglements: Aside from public sentiment risks, brands deploying misleading or deceptive claims in their controversial messaging open themselves to potential legal action. From regulatory bodies or even class action suits. The costs of managing lawsuits and investigations divert limited time and resources away from the business.
Essentially most brands should build affinity through ethical, creative messaging vs. stooping to anger or attack competitors.
